Bone quality refers to various characteristics of bone composition and structure that influence bone strength regardless of bone mineral density. These factors encompass bone turnover, microarchitecture, mineralization, microdamage, and the composition of both bone matrix and mineral.
Bone strength refers to the ability of bone to withstand fracture, such as the maximum load it can bear before breaking, under specific conditions like the impact experienced during a fall.
Additionally, SAC® supplementation led to higher calcium levels, further supporting bone health. This emphasizes the importance of comprehensive bone quality assessment and enhancement beyond BMD to reduce fracture risk and improve bone strength.
Best Solution
Can Help In The Future
Recent advancements in imaging technologies have enabled the evaluation of bone microarchitecture and composition, providing insights into bone quality beyond BMD.
Techniques such as High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) and Quantitative Ultrasonography (QUS) offer valuable information about bone structure, density distribution, and mechanical properties.
By integrating these novel modalities into clinical practice, we can obtain a more comprehensive understanding of bone health and improve risk stratification for fractures.
Can Help In The Future
New imaging technologies now assess bone microarchitecture and composition, giving insights beyond BMD for bone quality.
High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) and Quantitative Ultrasonography (QUS) reveal bone structure, density, and mechanical properties. Using these methods in clinics enhances our understanding of bone health and helps predict fracture risks better.
In summary, while an increase in bone density often suggests improved bone strength, it's essential to consider other aspects of bone quality for a comprehensive assessment of bone health.
By addressing both density and quality through holistic interventions, individuals can enhance their overall bone health and reduce the risk of fractures.
REFERENCES
-
Boskey AL, Coleman R. Aging and Bone. Journal of Dental Research. 2010;89(12):1333-1348. doi:10.1177/0022034510377791
-
Seeman, Ego. "Bone quality: the material and structural basis of bone strength." Journal of bone and mineral metabolism 26, no. 1 (2008): 1-8.
-
Siris, Ethel S., Ronald Emkey, Steve P. Harden, David M. Minshall, Conrad C. Miller, Reiner Barringer, and Steven K. Abbott. "Predictive value of low BMD for 1-year fracture outcomes is similar for postmenopausal women ages 50–64 and 65 and older: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA)." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 22, no. 9 (2007): 1445-1450.
-
Burghardt, Andrew J., Punam K. Saha, Thomas M. Link, and Sharmila Majumdar. "High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus." Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 93, no. 6 (2008): 2102-2108.
-
Bauer, Douglas C., Jane A. Cauley, Steven R. Cummings, Kristine E. Ensrud, Dennis M. Black, Marc C. Hochberg, and Michael C. Nevitt. "Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: misleading changes and regression to the mean." Journal of the American Medical Association 291, no. 1 (2004): 131-138.
-
Seeman, Ego, and Richard S. Weinstein. "The new bone biology: pathologic, molecular, and clinical correlates." Journal of Clinical Investigation 104, no. 12 (1999): 1689-1696.